Skip to content Skip to navigation
Skip to global navigation Menu

Vassar Encyclopedia

An online work in progress under the direction of Vassar's College Historian


The introduction of electric lighting during the 1880s attracted attention everywhere. On January 27, 1911, a group of Vassar trustees met in New York City at the home of the naturalist and Vassar trustee, Albert S. Bickmore, for a special meeting to evaluate the condition and the future of Vassar’s heating and lighting system. When the trustees had settled themselves in Bickmore’s home, facing the west side of Central Park fifteen blocks from the Natural History Museum, of which Bickmore was a primary founder, President James Monroe Taylor began the meeting with a brief memorandum addressing the necessity for immediate change in the college’s illumination. Trustee Samuel D. Coykendall and Vassar parent Frederick S. Blackall, who had conducted an extensive, yearlong survey of the equipment and layout of the gasworks, presented their proposal for electrifying Vassar’s campus along with a proposed budget for the work from the firm Lord & Co. The plan and the budget were unanimously adopted.

By the time Vassar was ready to implement electrical lighting, the incandescent light bulb had become the standard source of artificial light throughout the United States. The trustees’ Executive Committee, waiting until the cost of incandescent lighting had dropped below that of gas lighting, acted at the right time, both technologically and economically. The expiration of the basic Edison lamp patents in 1894 had allowed for increased competition. And the introduction of phosphorus-exhaust bulbs two years later along with the adoption of mass-production techniques allowed for much cheaper lamps than the solely gas-fueled type that had been on the market since the 1860s. (2) Residential rates per kilowatt-hour had dropped from twenty cents in 1897 to about nine cents in 1912; large-scale, industrial rates experienced a similar decline. Further, steam turbines had been introduced to commercial and industrial institutions. Under the supervision of Trustee Coykendall and Blackall, the president of a large Rhode Island manufacturing firm, the integration of direct current incandescent lighting with the previous system of coal-fed steam boilers fit nicely into a long-term plan that allowed for the relatively manageable installation of steam turbines twenty years later.

Studying around a Welsbach gas burner in Main building, circa 1905.
Studying around a Welsbach gas burner in Main building, circa 1905.

The supply of gas to the individual dormitory rooms had been an issue of perpetual concern for both the college administration and the student body. Up until the 1870s, light in each dormitory room was supplied by small, two-foot gas powered burners under the assumption that students preferred to study in the parlors—where six-foot burners blazed without restriction—and not in their individual rooms. The two-foot burners, which were notoriously ineffective for comfortable study, were replaced with four-foot burners after reports reached the administration of students tampering with the tips of the burners in order to increase the stream of gas; it was said, too, that certain enterprising and gutsy students attempted to augment the gas flow with a carefully placed punch to the gas regulator. The college reported twenty cases of these “self-improved” lamps.

Such attempts to acquire “licht, mehr licht,” as President John Raymond had wryly put it, were potentially hazardous to the safety and health of the student. The potential of carbon dioxide poisoning dramatically increased due to the altered flow of gas. The amount of light given off by the burner, though increased, was still small; the light constantly fluttered and the danger of fire was great. Cases of near-sightedness, already a concern even before the alterations to the lamps, were rumored to be on the rise. In December of 1873, The Springfield Republic criticized the college for failing to administer adequate lighting to the dormitory rooms, which, as a result, created a “fearfully prevalent” amount of eye problems among the student body. “Many of [the sleeping-rooms] are furnished with a burner that never gives anything but a small yellow jet,” the newspaper wrote, “four-feet burners they may be, but in many cases all the light that comes from [them] is nothing more than flickering yellow jet.”

A student in her newly electrified room in Main Building, circa 1912.
A student in her newly electrified room in Main Building, circa 1912.

Once Vassar’s plan was approved, Lord & Co. began installation early in 1911. By the commencement of the 1911 fall semester, electrical lighting and heating had been effectively installed in Main building. The rest of the campus, including residence halls, academic buildings, and the library followed soon after, as electrical outfitting quickly reached completion by the early months of 1912. Once electrical lighting had become fully installed in the hallways of Main, students were provided with a gooseneck lamp in addition to the gas lamp, allowing them to arrange the light in almost any position. The gooseneck lamp also allowed for a sleepy roommate to rest as working students could direct the light to the corner of the room, effectively illuminating one side of the room and leaving the other in relative darkness. Instead of having to cope with the overhead flickering of the gas lamp, students began to prize the convenience and utility of electric light in their dormitory rooms—not to mention that maneuverable light lent itself well to festive gatherings, Halloween parties in particular.

Meanwhile, using the rising interest in the technology for curricular purposes, the college offered a course on Electricity. Enthusiasm for the course, offered as a science elective three days a week and exploring simple applications of the new science, coincided with a greater national curiosity with the swiftly moving technology. “I’ve been on the jump in lab all morning over electric currents and scared all the time for fear something would go wrong,” fretted Muriel Eldrige, class of 1914, in a letter home to her family in the fall of 1911; she concluded, perhaps reassuringly: “despite such fear, I’m still alive.”

All of the energy for the new installations was produced in Vassar’s own campus power house. The power house continued to function as the college’s primary energy source until 1955, when the college switched over to buying outside electricity from Hudson Heat and Electric. In 1973, the power house was the first of several neighboring utility buildings to be adaptively re-used, when it opened as the Hallie Flanagan Davis Powerhouse Theater.


  1. Adjusted for subsequent inflation, in 2008 the city’s electrification venture would cost some $400,000.
  2. Air-exhaust had been a major problem of electric light production up to this point. However, it was found that the vacuum produced when a very small amount of red-phosphorous vapor was placed in the exhaust tube of the bulb while the filament was heated slightly above normal operating temperature improved the device’s air-flow, vastly expediting manufacture.


Arthur A. Bright, The Electric-Lamp Industry: Technological Change and Economic Development from 1800 to 1947, New York, 1949.

“’The Shame of Vassar,’ Again,” The Springfield Republican, December 26, 1873.

Edmund Platt, The Eagle’s History of Poughkeepsie: From the Earliest Settlements 1683 to 1905, Poughkeepsie, 1905.

Student Letters, collection from 1911–1912, Volume 27, Vassar College Special Collections.

Vassar Board of Trustee Minutes from January 27, 1911, Trustee Minutes 1892–1912, Vassar College Special Collections.

Related Articles

MPB 2006, KW 2008